Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/User:StaufferBuddy

BD2412 T 14:32, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

User:StaufferBuddy
Excessive content unrelated to Wikiquote posted repeatedly by a user who is indefinitely blocked at Wikipedia. — Ningauble (talk) 14:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 15:00, 23 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as nom, and salt. Consider checking for sockpuppetry. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, salt as needed. BD2412 T 18:12, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't know what "salt" refers to, but I have to agree with Ningauble that sockpuppetry may be at play. User:StaufferBuddy has been edited by 98.237.141.251, but not by StaufferBuddy her-/himself.  StaufferBuddy, by contrast, has edited User talk:CobyCornWall, and CobyCornWall has edited User talk:StaufferBuddy and Alaska Thunderfuck 5000, the latter of which, as we know, is problematic for its lack of citations.  (In all of this, the only useful edit appears to be redirecting ANTM to America's Next Top Model, made by StaufferBuddy on 30 August.) In general, I would only support deleting the content of a user page if (A) that user has been banned, (B) the page constitutes a copyright violation, or (C) the page includes death threats.  What makes this case strange is that the only editor of the StaufferBuddy user page is an IP address.  If these are not the same person, then it's quite probably that StaufferBuddy does not know about the edits to her/his profile, and would not approve of said edits.  (Note that StaufferBuddy's last Wikiquote edit was 10 September, and 98.237.141.251 did not begin editing User:StaufferBuddy until 15 September.)  On the other hand, if they are the same person, then the only edits this person has made between these two accounts include (A) redirecting ANTM to America's Next Top Model (30 August), (B) editing Alaska Thunderfuck 5000 in order to remove "{  {vfd-new}  }" and to change the title of the "Quotes" section to "Sourced Quotes" (10 September), (C) editing User talk:CobyCornWall to write, "You Will Be Blocked From Editing The Next Time Remove A Votes for deletion Notice, Just Like You Did At Alaska Thunderfuck 5000" (10 September, nine minutes after the previous edit), and (D) various edits to User:StaufferBuddy ‎ (15–16 September). I suspect that a sockpuppet check will show that all three of these accounts are from the same person, in which case we can add to the list of edits made by this person the various edits made to the Alaska Thunderfuck 5000 page between 31 August and 11 September.  It would mean that this person had twice removed "{  {cleanup}  }", thrice removed "{  {unreferenced}  }", once removed "{  {prod}  }", and twice removed "{  {vfd-new}  }".  If these three accounts are all of the same person, then not only do I support deleting the user page, but I would say that this editor is simply trying to be disruptive, and would probably deserve a ban. Sincerely, allixpeeke (talk) 23:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * To salt a title is to protect it from being recreated again, alluding to the ritual practice of "salting the earth". This page has already been deleted twice before[//en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3AStaufferBuddy] and was edited by all three of StaufferBuddy, CobyCornWall, and 98.237.141.251. They also created other pages that have already been deleted. Both named accounts are indefinitely blocked at Wikipedia for "not being here [i.e. there] to build an encyclopedia", and they clearly are not here to build a compendium of notable quotations. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:44, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, I did not know it had already been deleted multiple times, nor who edited it prior to its most recent creation. That he/she/they also, as you report, created other pages that have already been deleted, this only reinforces my suspicion that these are socks of a single, disruptive editor.  In addition to my support for deleting the page, I now add my support for salting it.  allixpeeke (talk) 07:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt per above points. --Rubbish computer (talk) 16:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)