Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/User:Victorrrmz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Keep. - closing early as a snowball nomination without grounding in policy. BD2412 T 00:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

User:Victorrrmz
De-prodded non-notable self promoter. No Wikipedia article on this subject, no sourced quotes. Ningauble noted that this material was previously deleted as "Victor Ramirez" for the same reason. And was deleted at the Spanish Wikiquote for self-promotion


 * Vote closes: 20:00, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep for now. Editors are generally allowed to have their own quotes on their own user page. While we may revisit this in the future, it is too early to say that this editor should not be allowed to have a user page. He may well turn out to be a fine contributor. Cheers! BD2412 T 19:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - I see no problem with a user keeping personal quotes on his or her user page. ~ UDScott 19:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep — though the page created in article space by a person who still seems ignorant of much of the proper protocol on the Wikimedia projects was clearly inappropriate, I do not see any problem with this as a user page. ~ Kalki (talk &middot; contributions) 20:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

I am not a criminal. I'm here to support, to teach and learn good things. honestly--Victorrrmz 23:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - I am trying to contribute with more quotas and donations, I just ask a little patience to learn more about this site.


 * Comment: The above nomination by newcomer Deezy.D. is a bit misleading about the history of this page, and my involvement with it. This user page was not prod in user space, and I was refering to articles. Although substantially similar content was deleted as an article two times, the purposes of articles and user pages are distinctly different. ~ Ningauble 20:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)