Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Wandervogel

Wandervogel
Multiple issues:
 * NPOV: All quotes are by Hans Blüher, who reduced the Wandervogel movement in his writings to a sexual motivated organisation. The quotes chosen mirror this, but do not do justice to the movement. Blüher's writings were contested shortly after their publication.
 * Out of scope: All quotes were published only in German. There is no authorized (or even common) English translation of Blüher's writings.
 * Inaccurate 1: The English translations are highly interpretative and omit parts of the German texts.
 * Inaccurate 2: Even the German texts contain a number of mispellings, obvious to everybody fluent in German. Since I don't own Blüher's book I can't correct them within the standards of Wikiquote. — Jergen (talk) 08:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 09:00, 18 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Jergen. Thanks for your feedback. It is OK to delete, but better would be to add a quote representing the opposing view. I reviewed the German and the translation, and found only one spelling error. Could you let me know the others? I removed two quotes that were not relevant to the topic, leaving only one. The two quotes I removed are still in the Hans Blüher article, so I would still be happy to get your corrections on them. Thanks! ~ Peter1c (talk) 13:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: This is a poor article, but it would be difficult to defend deletion.--Abramsky (talk) 14:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)--Abramsky (talk) 14:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I defend it thus: this is a poor article. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apart from the seeming impropriety of presenting a one-sided view that this is so gay, quotability of this rumination appears to be lacking. In particular, when something does not appear to have been notably quoted or translated in English before I think it can be presumed inappropriate for the English Wikiquote . ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I am minded to support deletion, but being one-sided is not in itself grounds for deletion.--Abramsky (talk) 13:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC)