Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Wikiquote:Confirmed users


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: DELETE. FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 01:58, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikiquote:Confirmed users
There is no need to have local copies of documentation for MediaWiki features that are not, and never have been, used at Wikiquote. This was apparently copied from Wikipedia's WP:CONFIRM, but has not been customized for Wikiquote's configuration: only bureaucrats can grant this, en.wp has a local customization giving this bit to administrators. — Ningauble (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Vote closes: 17:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as nom. There has only been one occasion when I might have used this if I could, when a good-faith editor was temporarily de-confirmed by the Abuse Filter. I suggested the user contact a bureaucrat, but he just waited for auto-confirm to kick back in. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. ~ UDScott (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete If it is incorrect, then it is worse than useless. Or can it be re-written to be correct?--Collingwood (talk) 21:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.