Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/William Sanjour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: '''delete. --Saroj Uprety (talk) 11:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)'''.

William Sanjour
Unreferenced and no indication of notability in lead section and no corresponding article on the English Wikipedia. VFD raised following Speedie decline. — DeirgeDeltac 00:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Vote closes: 01:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: (nominator) -- 00:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: (article creator)
 * I've added sources for each quote using the citation template, but I think there's an inputting error on my end: the citation seems to disappear?
 * I'm also in-progress of making a Wikipedia article; w:Draft:William Sanjour has numerous sources collected.
 * TypistMonkey (talk) 03:23, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @: There's little point expecting people to look at a w:WP:CITEBOMB on an English Wikipedia draft. I have more respect for an article that has been persisted part w:WP:NPP. Removal of notification template on a previous article of yours (albeit by  not by yourself) with the disparging attacks in the edit summary against NPP patroller  might not do you any favors. Suggest you present your w:WP:THREE best sources here please as proper citations not bare URLs if you're not going to get your English Wikipedia Article persisted. Thankyou. -- DeirgeDeltac 06:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Markjoseph125 (talk) 14:59, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.