Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/정신분석과 지그문트 프로이트


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Deleted. — Jeffq 12:59, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

정신분석과 지그문트 프로이트
Besides inapropriate name (in Korean), probably the whole copy of a certain webpage (see the last line of this page), hence strongly doubting as copyright infringemen. --Aphaia 08:30, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Vote closed. Result: Deleted (4 Deletes, 1 implicit Delete; no dissent). &mdash; Jeff Q (talk) 12:59, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash; Jeff Q (talk) 10:50, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete speedily. --Eustace Tilley 11:18, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * The original is here, the author explicitly reserves all rights, so I replaced the text with a properly cited link. --Eustace Tilley 11:40, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: currently Wikiquote policy doesn't include copyvio as a speedy deletion candidates, if I recall correctly. --Aphaia 12:47, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Similar fuzzy-logic problems use a point system. This page earns speedy delete points for a title which displays as all question marksan anonymous contributorno comments by the contributor at the time of creationno Wiki formattingno link to the external sourceno reference to the authorno credit to the author<li>no evidence that the lengthy work has ever been performed</li><li> violation of the observation of rights the author posted on her page</li></ul>That is enough merit a speedy exit, in my opinion.--Eustace Tilley 13:38, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * It is different if those articles could be speedy deletion candidate and if our policy says so currently. If you want to contitue the discussion on this point, please don't do it here but on WQ:VP. --Aphaia 15:42, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't see any utility for keeping this. jni 12:03, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. We need to formulate a copyright violation policy as well. Rmhermen 13:43, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.