Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Arnold calls a drunk guy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. —LrdChaos (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Arnold calls a drunk guy
Whatever fame this may have achieved on the Internet, it's nothing more than a prank call using short snippets of dialogue from Arnold Schwarzenegger. The quotes, in and of themselves, mean nothing, and they've been shorn from any context. —LrdChaos (talk) 15:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Vote closed. Result: delete (six votes to delete (two to speedy), no dissent). —LrdChaos (talk) 14:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. —LrdChaos (talk) 15:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. ~ UDScott 15:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, unremarkable subject. No WP article, 28 unique Google hits, source (undescribed in article) is apparently a user-created Google video, material is ripped off from other works, extremely unlikely to have reliable sources to demonstrate any notability. What's next? Mock movie trailers, with zero original material? ~ Jeff Q (talk) 17:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * One thing about the possibility of speedy-deleting this is that cases like this aren't covered by WQ:SD, which only permits the "unremarkable subject" SD of a "real person, group of people, band, or club". This has come up before (with the contemplated speedy deletion of a page for an unremarkable fictional character) and this same thing was pointed out. While I doubt that there'd be any clamor for a deletion review for a page like this (though if it were speedied, there'd be good cause), and I don't mean to be overly bureaucratic (and insist on following the rules at whatever cost), our SD policy specifically lists the allowable cases for this, and subjects like videos/fictional characters/etc. are not included among them, though perhaps they should be. —LrdChaos (talk) 14:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Not notable. --Sir James Paul 17:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. - InvisibleSun 20:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.