Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Be and Do


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete both. — Jeffq 12:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Be and Do
Identical pages that contain nothing worth keeping; neither of these pages can really be expanded to include anything more than the same 'joke' present on both of them. &mdash;LrdChaos 13:29, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Vote closed. Result: delete both (7 deletes; no dissent). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 12:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. &mdash;LrdChaos 13:29, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. ~ UDScott 13:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Robert 16:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. - InvisibleSun 20:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Koweja 00:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. 121a0012 01:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't recall where from at the moment, but I'm fairly sure these three consecutive quotes are a single joke from some routine or comedy. If it can be sourced, it belongs wherever it may be properly attributed. It certainly doesn't make for a reasonable theme article, let alone two. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 05:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: It appears the "fortunes2" database on my Linux machine, as two variants. The closest just starts off with Shakespeare's "To be or not to be", and the other includes a couple of others, ending with "Yabba dabba do" from The Flintstones. For neither one is any sort of source listed. &mdash;LrdChaos 05:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.