Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Crash:Twinsanity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 04:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Crash:Twinsanity
If someone can make any sense of this article, I'd be obliged. There's too much there that's almost intelligible for me to call it "patent nonsense", but the article doesn't leave me with any idea what it's trying to convey. I suppose it's probably yet another collection of inane dialogue from a video game or something. 121a0012 04:53, 17 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Vote closed. Result: delete (4 deletes, incl. 1 implicit; 1 keep). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 04:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep & move, to Crash Twinsanity, which is the correct title of this video game (and the corresponding WP page). While I agree that the quotes are fairly inane, we do already have a lot of video game pages. This one could use some cleanup and a better intro, but it should probably stay. ~ UDScott 15:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If it's anything like the original "Crash Bandicoot" game, and a lot like just about any other video game, there's probably not very much quotable from it; certainly, nothing in the current version of the page seems to bear that out. —LrdChaos (talk) 20:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Some of the contributors to these video game pages seem relentlessly determined to quote anything whatsoever in the videos. They end up quoting everything, resulting in potential copyvios.  Perhaps the only way to stop this trend is to start deleting pointless quotes. - InvisibleSun 05:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although UDScott has a good point, I'm inclined to side with 121a0012, LrdChaos, and InvisibleSun on this article. Until we get the level of participation that allows virtually unintelligible new articles about notable subjects to be assured of cleanup in a reasonable time, I find myself wanting to hold articles (and the editors who create them) to some minimal amount of basic literacy and quote meaningfulness. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 04:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.