Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Daniel Lazarowski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 06:20, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Daniel Lazarowski
Not notable. The first Google result is the WQ page. The quote itself might be preserved, if someone can locate the missing context that would make it make sense. 121a0012 05:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Vote closed. Result: delete (5 deletes, incl. 1 implicit; no dissent). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 06:20, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. ~ UDScott 20:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. - InvisibleSun 01:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash;LrdChaos 15:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like a quote from a software developer. Perhaps about assuming a collaborative project will run out of the box? In any case, no WP article, barely any Google presence at all. We don't collect unverifiable quotes from unnotables, even when they're clever. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 05:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.