Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Daniel dawson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. — Jeffq 15:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Daniel dawson
Daniel Dawson has a talent for drinking. We ourselves have a talent for deleting. His notability has not been demonstrated. - InvisibleSun 23:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Vote closed. Result: delete (6 deletes from regular editors, incl. 1 implicit; 2 keeps from editors who have only engaged in multiple voting and/or vandalism; no response from article creator). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 15:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. 121a0012 02:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Koweja 03:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious vanity page. I've posted a vanity-warn in case the article creator wishes to move or copy these quotes to his user page. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 05:44, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep this man deserves to be on here because of his bass and drinking talents.
 * Keep Daniel Dawson sounds to be a good man with traditional ideals and religious beliefs (a fervent Opus Dei member as a matter of fact).
 * Keep i like the cut of this mans jib, i would like to meet him, so we can drink and play bass.
 * Note:The above three "Keep" votes were made by User:194.72.50.161, who was then blocked after vandalizing my userpage six times. - InvisibleSun 09:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. ~ UDScott 12:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash;LrdChaos 13:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Keep him, blatantly that is the right thing to do. Who else drinks and plays bass splendidly and is a maths prodigy? I vote KEEP, and becaus ei am so superb and the mother of many oragnizations I count for many others. I count I tell you, keep him!


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.