Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Frank Tyger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: deleted.. — Aphaia 20:39, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

Frank Tyger
Wp article is completely content-free, no intro, no sources for the quotes, only google hits are quote sites as far as the eye can see. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 11:15, 23 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Vote closed. Result: deleted. (2 deletes, no dissent). --Aphaia 20:39, 6 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 11:15, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless evidence provided of notability. I've nominated its WP article for deletion as well, so that may generate more information with which to judge. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 13:17, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Wow! Wikipedia is getting serious about "unsalvageable" stub articles. They already speedy-deleted Frank Tyger. Ours, however, has meaningful content, whether or not it's notable, so we should proceed with this VfD. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 16:33, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: But, of course, proceed with the VfD now knowing there is no wp article :) ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 08:42, 26 July 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.