Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Gareth Cushley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. — Jeffq 15:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Gareth Cushley
Name search reveals nothing notable. - InvisibleSun 11:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Vote closed. Result: delete (6 deletes from regular editors, incl. 1 implicit; 2 keeps from editors w/ minimal contributions who have voted multiple times or vandalized; no notability evidence provided). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. ~ UDScott 12:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash;LrdChaos 13:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep
 * Comment. This vote is the first contribution from this user, made less then five minutes after registering the account. &mdash;LrdChaos 20:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep- sheerly deserves a wiki quote dedication.
 * Delete unless evidence of notability provided and some meaningful, sourced quotes added. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 03:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. 121a0012 03:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Koweja 17:20, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep- this man sounds worthy of wikiquote status.
 * Note: User:Emlynisnota, having voted three times on this nomination and having been warned after the second time, is now blocked from editing for two weeks. - InvisibleSun 11:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep
 * Comment: This user has no meaningful contributions; other than this vote, they created the Kevin McCarron page which is up for deletion, and vandalism of UDScott's user page. &mdash;LrdChaos 13:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please, by all means delete this little experiment, but honeslty, you people have way too much time on your hands. Bound to be English!,  Thank you.
 * It's not that we have time to waste: it's being wasted by those who create worthless articles.  We are then compelled, as a matter of fairness, to do searches on the subjects and quotes in these articles and to put them to a vote. Speaking of wasted time: do you think you might actually manage to sign your comments, instead of hiding behind anonymity and leaving it to others to supply  your signature?  - InvisibleSun 15:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.