Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Image:Queenmum2.jpg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. — MosheZadka 09:44, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Queenmum2.jpg
On Wikipedia, it should have been deleted about 6 months ago according to their policies: it comes from an unknown source. I believe it should be deleted here, without regards to whether WP follows policies correctly. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 12:06, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Vote closed: Result: delete (3 delete, no dissent, deleted from wp) ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 09:44, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 12:06, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and I agree that it should go regardless of the actions on WP. UDScott 14:02, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. If a GFDL- or CCL-compatible source is found, it should be uploaded to Commons for general use. I was hoping to find an image and blanket public-domain ruling for images on a UK government site (like the U.S.'s ".gov" provides), but a quick sifting of info at www.royal.gov.uk suggests the UK may not have the same guidelines. (Its "Crown Copyright" page seems both to restrict general use to downloading, printing, and hyperlinking, and to allow both broader and more restrictive licenses for images on its site. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 20:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have managed to get it deleted on WP too: see w:Special:Undelete/Image:Queenmum2.jpg ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 10:44, 21 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.