Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Jeff Detweiler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. — Jeffq 16:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Jeff Detweiler
Not notable. ~ UDScott 20:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Vote closed. Result: delete (3 Deletes; 1 Keep from anon creator, who subsequently forged additional votes and deleted others; no notability evidence provided). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 16:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. ~ UDScott 20:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, possibly vanity. I had just been in the process of nominating this when I hit an edit conflict adding the VfD tag to that article. &mdash;LrdChaos 20:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete: Although the page appears to be inuseful, I saw it some time ago normal and unvandalised with the "BLEH" 69.196.121.87 01:52, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * This user (69.196.121.87) had deleted both my and UDScott's delete votes from this nomination. &mdash;LrdChaos 02:12, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless evidence of notability provided. Weird stuff happening here: (A) Wikiquote's first double nomination (an encouraging sign); (B) one anon vandalizing (or perhaps just commenting on) another anon's likely vanity page. I also found 69's comment confusing; they were apparently trying to say that "BLEH" was the vandalization, not the original text. I've reverted 72.56.10.227's edits to provide the original quote text for proper review. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 17:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete because nothing is wrong about an article that doesn't hurt anybody (Such as this one) 69.196.121.87 23:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The above vote is an illegal second one from . This user attempted to forge it with the username "dsantesteban", but I have reverted this. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 01:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete because this article is an article of Quotes and is not being created with disrespect to anybody. What's so wrong about an article about somebody who is known by many people but not so many? 71.34.10.291 01:02, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The above vote was forged by . ~ Jeff Q (talk) 01:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.