Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Lawrence Eagleburger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: . Keep. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 00:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Lawrence Eagleburger
The unsourced quotation which comprises this article reads "The United States is not without guilty". I can find no authority for changing "guilty" to "guilt" or for making any other correction that would give it some sort of meaning, but if the quote has to remain as it is then the whole article looks rather pointless. Antiquary 22:22, 11 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Vote closed: Result: Keep. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 00:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: Pending valid quotes being entered. Bsimanek 23:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep now that I've replaced the unsourced, ungrammatical quote with 1 sourced and 3 unsourced quotes. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 09:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep with Jeff Q's additions. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 10:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. ~ UDScott 15:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. (I deleted one of the three Unsourced quotes because two of the quotes were identical.) - InvisibleSun 15:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't follow the "identical" part — the sourced quote is about Iraq, leading up to the 2003 war, whereas the unsourced quote is about North Korea going nuclear — but I'm not crazy about unsourced quotes anyway, so I won't argue for it. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 17:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I was referring to two of the Unsourced quotes, as seen in this earlier edit, with the first and third Unsourced quotes being the same. - InvisibleSun 17:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. —LrdChaos (talk) 15:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'd like a bit better intro, but other than that it seems like a fine stub now.  (I wonder if we have enough people to justify creating Category:Diplomats?)  121a0012 02:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.