Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Lord Tabinor of Thoreleston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: . Speedy delete as hoax. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 10:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Lord Tabinor of Thoreleston
Not notable. I cannot find anything on anyone notable by this name (or any of the incarnations in the history of this page, including Matthew Tabinor).


 * Vote closed early: Speedy delete as admitted hoax. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 09:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless evidence of notability is provided. ~ UDScott 19:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - blast, I can't be bothered to make quite a useful, informative page if people keep trying to delete it! Leviathan 20:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC) (Private Secretary to the Lord Tabinor)
 * Delete unless evidence is produced for the above. There is at any rate no such peerage as "Lord Tabinor of Thoreleston". Antiquary 20:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Leviathan seems to have confessed this was a hoax... speedy delete now? Bsimanek 21:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, patent nonsense, as hoaxes are consider vandalism per WP:HOAX. Users, , and (quite possibly the same person) should be suitably warned against repeating this prank. Lord Tabinor of Asterley, created when WackoMatto twice moved the article in the same minute, claiming "incorrect title", should also be deleted. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 00:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.