Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Maczek Wolniek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: . Deleted. Essjay ( Talk  • Connect  ) 06:06, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Maczek Wolniek
Google search for name yields nothing of note. The Wikipedia link is bogus. - InvisibleSun 02:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Vote closes: 24 November 2006 3:00 (UTC)


 * Delete. - InvisibleSun 02:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unintelligible in my opinion.  121a0012 03:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unremarkable subject, to say the least. Appears to be a hoax or joke, minimally a self-admitted vanity page. I asked for a speedy deletion on this one. Is that wrong, if there is already an ongoing VfD? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ubiquity (talk • contribs) 09:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've posted a vanity-warn to creator's talk page (see comments below). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 10:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * I've removed the db tag because we have an active VfD now. A sysop may summarily close a VfD with a speedy-deletion judgment, but once it's nominated here, users should not nominate an article for speedy-deletion. It should rather be discussed here until the vote is otherwise closed, early or not.
 * I'm against speedy at this time because this article has been speedy-deleted but was recreated after a user took the trouble to register a username; and yet no one informed this new user of our policy against vanity articles. We should try to remember, despite the recent spate of vandalism, that many new users who create vanity articles just aren't aware that Wikiquote is not MySpace. We must remember to assume good faith.
 * As we now have an SD policy that allows us to summarily delete obvious vanity articles, I've created a vanity-warn-sd that we can post to user's talk pages, that covers the situation when such an article is deleted before the user can respond. (I expect this to be very common, as it's been my experience that such new editors often create their articles, then disappear for weeks or months, if they come back at all.) ~ Jeff Q (talk) 10:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. ~ UDScott 14:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. —LrdChaos (talk) 15:48, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.