Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Obvious Discrete


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 23:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Obvious Discrete
This is page is (at the time) an exact duplicate of User:Obvious Discrete, and the quotes appear to be attributable to the user only (with no claim to notability). &mdash;LrdChaos 20:40, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Vote closed. Result: delete (5 Deletes; 2 Keeps, one from vote-forger User:Obvious Discrete, one from probable sockpuppet of same; no other dissent). ~ Jeff Q (talk) 23:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash;LrdChaos 20:40, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, concur with LrdChaos. ~ UDScott 20:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, "no claim to notability." ?! What is a claim but an opinion. We all know opinions are like... and everybody has them!  You yourself "claim" to be a "Lord" of "Chaos", but do you rule under a feudal society of peasants and slaves and create chaos amongst them? No, but do I question your "notability" to question my "notability". <-- That's a rhetorical question... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Obvious Discrete (talk • contribs) 20:52, 24 April 2006  (UTC)
 * Keep, why does one need to be notable in order for their quotes to belong here? and to that notion, who are we to chose who is notable and who is not?  i thorougly enjoyed reading Obvious Discrete's quotes rather than your "notable" opinions - Commander Andersen —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.53.110.144 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 24 April 2006  (UTC)
 * Based on style, timing, and sole contribution as VfD, this is likely a sockpuppet of Obvious Discrete. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 13:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete : Personal quotes on the User's page are fine... not in the articles; Wikiquote clearly adheres to the guidelines for Wikipedia on the matter of vanity pages. ~ Harry Tuttle 07:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Self-admitted vanity page, based on above unsigned vote from the putative subject. I have already removed its entry in List of people by name and a vanity quote from Beauty. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 13:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, I change my vote. It's funny how those who choose to label others as notable are anything but notable themselves. The irony is amusing. I vote to keep this page because not only did the quotes ammuse me, but to disagree with you peons is pleasure enough. There is as much mention in the votes to keep this page of "self-admitted vanity" as you so proclaim as there is testosterone in your body Mr. Tuttle. Jeff Q (talk) 07:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Obvious Discrete (talk • contribs) 13:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. The above "vote" is from, not Jeff. &mdash;LrdChaos 14:22, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Per Blocking policy, I have blocked User:Obvious Discrete indefinitely for impersonating another user. I have also struck the entire content of their forged vote under my name. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 16:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The vote was vandalized (Jeff's text changed and the struck-through portion restored) by . &mdash;LrdChaos 19:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete We don't accept personal quotes. It is our policy. --Aphaia 10:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.