Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Portal:Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: delete. — MosheZadka 19:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Portal:Law
Bunch of red links. While portals can be useful, I would appreciate some discussion as to how to best affect them, or at least some out-of-the-way experiments (user or wikiquote namespaces) before implemented. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 06:26, 3 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Vote closed: Result: delete (3 delete, no dissent) ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 19:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 06:26, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless anonymous user registers and convinces the community what use such pages would be. We don't have the adminstrative bandwidth for novel subprojects from unregistered users. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 06:57, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Now. Though portal is a basically good idea, portals with maintenance is horrible and shabby, so community approval is necessary to keep it, or a portal can't survive its own community, even very small. --Aphaia 04:00, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Also, note that on Wikiquote, as opposed to Wikipedia, The "Portal:" is not a namespace. It's a good thing, probably: it means we don't have portals right now officially. Anyone who wants to start portals should probably start them at Wikiquote:Portals subpages until they get wide acceptance. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 09:53, 15 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.