Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Tim Redmond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Deleted.. — Aphaia 00:51, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

Tim Redmond
No intro, not clear who this is. No wikipedia article. Google points to one, Tim Redmond, Bay Guardian Executive Editor. I am not sure if being executive editor of a newspaper is notable, but even if so, some kind of link between the person and the links should be established. ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 18:52, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * VOTE closed: Result: Deleted. (3 deletes, no dissent). --Aphaia 00:51, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete but significnat cleanup and clearing up could change my opinion ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 18:52, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've asked the anonymous editor who created this article to provide some info on who this is, so we can better judge if it should be kept. I've also added a close date two weeks from this posting to give them some time to respond. &mdash; Jeff Q (talk) 00:15, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: There is no information from the original contributor . I extended the vote for three days. Unless any information is provided, I incline to delete it. --Aphaia 9 July 2005 03:50 (UTC)
 * Delete unless evidence of notability provided. It is incumbent upon the 3000+ editors of Wikiquote, not the 6 active sysops, to provide such evidence. &mdash; Jeff Q (talk) 21:59, 9 July 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.