Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/To Kit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Kept. — Jeffq 05:41, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

To Kit
No notability, no external links, only edited by one (anonymous) user.MosheZadka 13:19, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Vote closed. Result: Kept (3 Keeps; 1 Delete; notability evidence provided and article revised to address some concerns). &mdash; Jeff Q (talk) 05:41, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete MosheZadka 13:19, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless provided with some evidence of notability. Quotes seem thoughtful enough to be real, but without context, this sounds much more like a vanity page than a published or otherwise documented source. &mdash; Jeff Q (talk) 15:00, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, based on article revisions. Would have been useful if author had provided the Wikipedia link in the article ([2] below); I've rectified that omission. &mdash; Jeff Q (talk) 19:25, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's genuine then... Sams 21:08, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Actually this page is translated by me, Jerry Crimson Mann, a wikipedia user. Its Chinese version should be at . To Kit is a famous Hong Kong columnist. (For further details, see here: [])(vote from anon, 218.102.234.33).
 * I point out "votes from anon" is problematic in the view of legitimacy. Hence registration is recommended ;-) Aph.
 * Keep And now the Wikipedia link was also provided. --Aphaia 06:44, 30 May 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.