Wikiquote:Votes for deletion archive/Wikiquote:Esperanza/Charter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: . Delete. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 12:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Esperanza/Charter
Another creation of, who won't let any advice or logic get in the way of his need to run an Esperanza project. He can't even be bothered to use correct namespaces and titles — I had to move this page from The Charter of Esperanza, which was inappropriately created in the article namespace. (If I didn't think he was just a naive user, I'd swear he's going through a list of Wikimedia policies and practices to see how many he can violate in as little time as possible.) The same arguments presented in WQ:VFD apply here as well, but I didn't want to add another page to that nomination because there has been a lot of activity there, and I felt it would be misleading to tack this on this late. But the fate of these two project pages are tied together. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Vote closed: Result: Delete. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 12:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. MatthewFenton 10:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 11:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. ~ UDScott 14:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per the arguments for the Wikiquote:Esperanza VFD. —LrdChaos (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. - InvisibleSun 19:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Antiquary 20:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Robert 03:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I deleted it.--Sir James Paul 19:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. (seems Sir James Paul's blanking was reverted) Unbelievable 04:46, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * UDScott reverted the blanking. We don't typically blank articles under VfD unless they present an immediate copyvio or attack on an unnotable. We try to present articles in the form they were nominated, or as they are fixed during the discussion. It's mostly irrelevant in this case, but leaving it in place is still best for the discussion, especially as it has a note to make it clear it is not official Wikiquote policy. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 08:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Essjay ( Talk  • Connect  ) 07:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Dev920 08:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.